Gay Pride and Diversity

June 7, 2006 at 11:46 pm (Homosexuality, The Left)

From the Boston Herald, Macy's had a display for Boston's Pride Parade which included a mannequin wearing a rainbow flag (a widely-recognized homosexual symbol, the flag not the mannequin)). A group disapproving of homosexuality responded in protest. Macy's removed the mannequin wearing the flag. This, predictably, upset many gay activists, and even the mayor.

That decision upset gay activists, and Mayor Thomas M. Menino, whose spokesman said was “disappointed that Macy’s would bow to this kind of pressure.”

“The mayor believed the window reflected the diversity of our city,” spokesman Seth Gitell said. “This entire episode flies in the face” of that.

And We suppose this diversity does not include conservatives who disapprove of homosexuality or, at least, flaunting it (which "Pride Parades" do)?

How so very tolerant of them.

innaa naHnu-l-a'lam.

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. Wickedpinto said,

    I don’t care who you fuck, as long as you don’t hurt basic human progression.

    I know a number of homosexuals, in fact, I make a point of hitting every gay blog I know of, just so that they are “mainstream.”

    Doesn’t hurt that most of them are from Chi.

    But who you fuck, is who you fuck.

    I am a lifelong batchelor, it is better for me to be a constant opportunist, than for some homosexuals to develop real relationships?

    I just don’t see that as an argument.

    It’s okay for Wick to be a WHORE of a man, and maybe create numerous bastards, but it isn’t okay for various gay men to find a mate, and to live with a mate, and to create a small family dynamic?

    I PERSONALY disagree with homosexuality, but I have no right to judge.

    And most of those guys are good fucking guys.

    I don’t know, it’s a bitch.

    I chose “‘S’All Good” rather than “S’all Bad”

  2. Muslihoon said,

    Good point.

  3. Anonymous said,

    “it’s okay for Wick to be a WHORE of a man, and maybe create numerous bastards, but it isn’t okay for various gay men to find a mate, and to live with a mate, and to create a small family dynamic?”

    Say again? “It’s OK to use women and make them unwilling sexual-objects, but it’s not OK to turn people into a domesticated willing sexual-objects?”

    That one illusion justifies the other?

    “Muslihoon said, Good Point” that “S’All Good”.

    I don’t live in S’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: